An Economic Agenda in Search
of a President:
Can ‘Rebuild America’
replace the supple side in 1988?
Nina
Easton
BusinessWeek, March 28,
1988
This article discusses the
formation of a new group, mostly made up of democrats, who want to ‘Rebuild
America’ by promoting growth through investment to the public and to the next
president that takes office. To achieve this goal, short-term consumption would
be deferred in favor of savings and long-term investment in education,
industrial revitalization, and infrastructure. In the long run, the investment,
which runs an estimated total of $500 million to $1 trillion, would strengthen
the economy and the tax base.
The idea comes at the heels
of economists who want to recapture the growth issue from the supply siders and
concentrate on productive investment instead of pushing austerity. Capital
formation would be encouraged by incentives and policy makers are urged to
consider the effects on investment when crafting policies. The problem that
surfaces is that taxes need to be increased, as redirecting current government
spending to more productive uses would still be insufficient to provide such
investment capital. While this is unappealing, democratic pollsters agree that
the group gives the “big- picture vision” that is absent in the Presidential
campaign and suggests that voters, expecting a better America in the future,
would be willing to sacrifice. In addition, the reduction of the federal deficit
would reduce federal drain on national savings.