"The Third World Threat to the West’s Recovery," Business Week, February 7, 1983.
"IMF Austerity Prescriptions Could Be Hazardous," Business Week, February 21, 1983.
The Main Point
The
basic argument of these two articles is to point out the fact that Industrial
democracies once unaffected by developing nations are now vulnerable to such
nations. Also, that cuts in third world
imports might slow the growth in the industrialized nations.
The Summary
The
first article begins by revealing the ever-growing importance of the third
world market. It then talks about the
“irrational system” that the industrial nations (mainly the Northern
hemisphere) have in response to developing nations (known as the South). The second article goes into detail about
the affects of third world trade on the rest of the world, mainly, the
industrialized nations of the Northern hemisphere.
The Crucial Third World Market
The
third world market is expanding at a rate much greater than the already
developed nations. In 1980, it was at
an average of 3.1% growth compared to meager 0.9% growth for the industrial
nations. There is mention of the
falloffs to exports to third world nations, which will have a big impact. An example is the U.S. and their exports to
Mexico that fell by $5 billion in 1980.
The result of this is that the Third World market is now crucial to any
strategy for renewed growth in the industrial North.
Irrational System
The
irrational system, which is the North’s domination of international economic
structure, was denounced during the Non-Aligned Movement in June. In replacing it, Third World countries have
been demanding a massive transfer of resources from North to South. The IMF and the World Bank through policies
of stabilization would accomplish the replacement.
The Gaps are Closing In
The
Industrialized and Developing countries, and the gap between them are closing
in. Through trade, investment, and
financial dependency. This “squeezing”
together has made the Industrial nations more vulnerable to the economic
distress in the Developing nations.
Effects of Cuts on Third World Imports
The
IMF had decided to increase substantially its lending ability to developing
nations. The austerity plan, which by
many observers view, is not going to lead to an intended growth and manageable
debt, but to sharp contractions in both developing countries and industrial
nations. In order to accomplish such a
plan, the IMF is also forcing spending cuts on the developing nations, in order
to receive monetary lending. These spending
cuts could possibly upset the world financial system. It is said that the IMF should take into account world economic
conditions when it imposes its conditions.
“When a country gets in trouble, not because of its own mismanagement,
but because of the weak world economy, the IMF should be more generous than it
would be if world demand were buoyant.”
Summary by Chinh Doan