Fouad Ajami, “The Summer of Arab Discontent”, Foreign Affairs, Winter 1990
The Main Point
This article charts the rise of Saddam, his motivations for
invading Kuwait,
and the various scripts through which he represented his aggression as a bid for
a United Arab Nation, a bid which had been made twice before, most notably by
Nasser of Egypt four decades ago.
Relying on atavistic hatreds and nationalist/revisionist rhetoric,
Saddam upset the existing Arab power structure, and forced the rich Gulf
States to turn to American military support for a
credible deterrent. Ajami determines
that the very nature of Saddam’s bid to dominate the politics of the
Arab/Muslim region doomed it to fail.
It’s aggressive, blunt, and cruel nature forced the formation of a
coalition to stop it.
Summary
Ajami charts the political rise of Saddam to a point at
which he could place the third bid to dominate the Arab power structure (the
first bid was Nassers, the second was Khomeini’s). Saddam’s bid was based upon rousing feelings
of resentment and targeting them at the rich Gulf States
(especially the Saudi’s) which enjoyed a positive (and for Saddam, a much too
friendly and ‘polluting’) relationship with the west. Ajami discusses what Saddam’s revisionist bid had to offer to the
various states and peoples which came onboard, then turns to an analysis of the
Gulf states response. Condemned by
popular Arab opinion and the fatwa’s (ruling opinions) of religious leaders,
Saddam relied upon brute force to stake his claim to the Arab power structure. Gulf States,
especially Saudi Arabia,
which could not defend themselves from the Iraqi threat, were forced to turn to
the west for support, a decision which was also sanctioned by religious
leaders.
The Arab Geo-Political Situation
Ajami attributes much of the positive response to Saddams’
atavistic revisionism to the feeling in many Arab nations that they were being
‘left behind’. A growing feeling that
the rest of the world was moving on, developing democratic and successful
social structures while much of the Arab world was left with the worn trappings
of an outdated communist social order.
The envisioned unification of the Arab state was thus shaped in terms of
an us/them conflict between the Arabic religious community and the western
exploiters. Secondly, there has been a
distinction between the Arabs of the north (Arab al-Shimal) and the Arabs of
the gulf (Arab al-Kahlij). The Arabs of
the north had oft been content to spare the Arabs of the gulf their political
feuds in a political arrangement- the Arabs of the gulf were a source of
resources and funding. With its
invasion of Kuwait, Iraq ‘served a warrant’ on the old Arab order, and the
failed states of the north, with their grievances and despotic rule, spilled southwards,
destroying the cautious peace between the Arabs of the gulf and their
impoverished neighbors to the north.
Saddam’s Scripting:
Revisionism Revived
Saddam found a number of sources of support for his vision
of a United Arab Nation, from Yemen
to Beirut, to Algeria
and Tunisia. Saddam utilized religious rhetoric,
characterizing his annexation of Kuwait
as subordinate to the higher goal of removing the American presence from Gulf
lands. Thus the focus of Saddam’s
invasion was essentially to rid the Arab lands of external power structures
which would stand in the way of his ascent.
The Saudi Response
Popular opinion was not entirely on Saddam’s side however,
as condemnations of his ‘perversion’ of Islam for his own purposes began to
pour in from around the Arab world. The
majority of religious leaders condemned his tyranny, and ultimately, sealed his
fate. With the condemnation of his
actions, the invitation of foreign forces to secure the safety of the
threatened citizens of Kuwait
and Saudi Arabia
was sanctioned. Saddam’s bid to drive
the Americans out of Saudi Arabia
had done exactly the opposite- it brought them there, more so, it brought them
acceptance (if grudging) by the populace and Saudi rulers. The Gulf States
were simply incapable of becoming garrison states overnight, and had to seek
outside assistance. The American-led
coalition was hastily put together, and in many eyes Saddam’s fight was not
about a United Arab Nation, but just another tyrant engaging in power-grabbing
behavior.
Summary by Justin
Freeman