Hints
In effect, the two exercises
illustrate how moving from one set of Standards
(Exercise A--communications, Exercise B,
connections) to the next can represent the "i + 1" in
a learning progression.
Exercise A asked students to
focus on particular exchanges and reduce them to their core
language. In addition, students must practice short
introductory clauses (er sagt / ich sage) that allows them
to review verb endings and familiar rhetorical patterns.
Exercise B, simply by posing the
same logic as a descriptive or third person task, places not
one but two linguistic demands on the students. Unless
the teacher tells students to quote the text directly, the
class undertaking Exercise B may need to use subordinate
word order (the quote "wo sind meine Eltern" versus the
observation "wo seine Eltern sind") and switch personal
pronouns from the first to the third person (meine /
seine). Thus, the choice of exercise type will depend
on the one hand on whether the teacher feels students are
sufficiently challenged by having to display understanding
of the verbal exchanges in the text (Exercise A) or whether
they are ready for an assignment that asks them to alter
word order and pronominal usage. It will also depend
on what in-class activity is to be built on these
exercises.
For example, Exercise A would
lead to an in-class reenactment of the scene -- perhaps with
new endings or American variants, such as Frau Kramer
instructing Beckmann to use a new tool that he had never
seen before: a telephone book that lists current
addresses. Exercise B would be appropriate as a
preparatory stage for short summaries of the scene (see
exercises for Phase 4 in Unit 7 below) or, possibly for
opinion statements if negation or appropriate adjectives
have been studied previously ("Beckmann weiß nicht, wo
seine Eltern sind," "Frau Kramer ist nicht nett").